Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10609/39141
Anonymization of graph-based data is a problem which has been widely studied last years and several anonymization methods have been developed. Information loss measures have been carried out to evaluate the noise introduced in the anonymized data. Generic information loss measures ignore the intended anonymized data use. When data has to be released to third-parties, and there is no control on what kind of analyses users could do, these measures are the standard ones. In this paper we study different generic information loss measures for graphs comparing such measures to the cluster-specific ones. We want to evaluate whether the generic information loss measures are indicative of the usefulness of the data for subsequent data mining processes.
Mining methods and algorithms, Privacy, Quality and Metrics, Semi-structured data and XML, Data Mining, Networks, Data mining
Mining methods and algorithms, Privacy, Quality and Metrics, Semi-structured data and XML, Data Mining, Networks, Data mining
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 24 | |
| downloads | 54 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts