
handle: 11573/1748883
This study introduces a method for evaluating the design capacity of a structural system at different limit states using nonlinear analysis (NLA). At the core of this approach lies the Global Factor Method (GFM), which simplifies complex structural behaviour into concurrent local failure mechanisms (LFMs). These LFMs are organized hierarchically, based on their series or parallel arrangement within the system, allowing for the derivation of a global factor used for estimating the design value of the global capacity, matching a given target probability. Notably, this method eliminates the need for alternative metrics like interstorey drift or post-peak capacity reduction, directly identifying global failure as driven by concurrent LFMs. Its practical application involves conducting two nonlinear analyses—one with mean values of the basic variables and another accounting for uncertainties in the LFMs. Correlation among LFMs is handled pragmatically, by considering extremes of zero and full correlation to enhance usability in practical design and assessment scenarios. The efficiency of the proposed method is demonstrated through its application to a reinforced concrete frame modelled using OpenSeesPy. The developed method is intended for practical use in NLA, specifically tailored for practitioners seeking an accessible approach to estimate design values within a simplified framework. In a sense, it provides an important step toward formalizing design capacity assessment within everyday engineering practice. While it is not a fully rigorous solution, it offers a reasonably accurate estimate of the design capacity, bridging the gap left by current codes, which have so far overlooked this critical aspect in NLA.
Structural global capacity; Global Factor Method (GFM); Local Failure mechanisms (LFMs); Non-Linear Analysis (NLA)
Structural global capacity; Global Factor Method (GFM); Local Failure mechanisms (LFMs); Non-Linear Analysis (NLA)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
