
pmid: 18358893
The objective of this study was to compare the sealing ability of gutta-percha (GP) and Resilon on Enterococcus faecalis in the dentinal tubules. Bovine root dentin blocks were infected and filled with GP alone, GP with zinc oxide-eugenol sealer, GP with resin sealer, or Resilon with resin sealer. The blocks were incubated in Brain-Heart Infusion agar plates up to 4 weeks, after which dentin chips were collected from the canal walls. The optical density of the culture medium containing the dentin chips was measured and analyzed statistically. Our results indicated that none of the filling materials were able to prevent the regrowth of E. faecalis completely. Although we noted no significant differences in bacterial counts among those groups filled with sealers, different patterns of change in bacterial counts were noted regarding time points. Filling with Resilon and a resin-based sealer induced a significant reduction in the bacterial counts over time (P < .05).
Dentin/microbiology*, Analysis of Variance, Enterococcus faecalis/growth & development, sealer, Colony Count, Colony Count, Microbial, Root Canal Obturation/methods*, 610, Root Canal Filling Materials*, Root Canal Filling Materials, Microbial, Root Canal Obturation, Dentin, 617, Enterococcus faecalis, Animals, Cattle, Gutta-Percha, obturation
Dentin/microbiology*, Analysis of Variance, Enterococcus faecalis/growth & development, sealer, Colony Count, Colony Count, Microbial, Root Canal Obturation/methods*, 610, Root Canal Filling Materials*, Root Canal Filling Materials, Microbial, Root Canal Obturation, Dentin, 617, Enterococcus faecalis, Animals, Cattle, Gutta-Percha, obturation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
