
Abstract Background Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) assess patients’ health status and quality of life, improving patient care and treatment effects, yet little is known about their use and adherence in routine patient care. Aims We evaluated the adherence of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients to ePROs follow-up and whether specific patient characteristics are related to longitudinal non-adherence. Methods Since November 2016, the Breast Center at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin has implemented an ongoing prospective PRO routine program, requiring patients to complete ePROs assessments and consent to email-based follow-up in the first 12 months after therapy starts. Frequencies and summary statistics are presented. Multiple logistic regression models were performed to determine an association between patient characteristics and non-adherence. Results Out of 578 patients, 239 patients (41.3%, 95%CI: 37.3–45.5%) completed baseline assessment and all five ePROs follow-up during the first 12 months after therapy. On average, above 70% of those patients responded to the ePROs follow-up assessment. Adherence to the ePROs follow-up was higher during the COVID-19 pandemic than in the time periods before (47.4% (111/234) vs. 33.6% (71/211)). Factors associated with longitudinal non-adherence were younger age, a higher number of comorbidities, no chemotherapy, and a low physical functioning score in the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline. Conclusions The study reveals moderate adherence to 12-month ePROs follow-up assessments in invasive early breast cancer and DCIS patients, with response rates ranging from 60 to 80%. Emphasizing the benefits for young patients and those with high disease burdens might further increase adherence.
Adult, Research, COVID-19, Breast Neoplasms, Middle Aged, COVID-19 ; Aged [MeSH] ; Breast Neoplasms/therapy [MeSH] ; Early Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms/psychology [MeSH] ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/psychology [MeSH] ; Quality of Life [MeSH] ; COVID-19 [MeSH] ; Female [MeSH] ; Follow-Up Studies [MeSH] ; Adult [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Prospective Studies [MeSH] ; Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy [MeSH] ; Longitudinal Studies [MeSH] ; Compliance ; Middle Aged [MeSH] ; Oncology ; Return rate ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures [MeSH] ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/drug therapy [MeSH] ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/therapy [MeSH] ; Research ; Web-based questionnaire ; Patient Compliance/statistics, Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating, Quality of Life, Humans, Patient Compliance, Female, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Longitudinal Studies, Prospective Studies, Aged, Follow-Up Studies
Adult, Research, COVID-19, Breast Neoplasms, Middle Aged, COVID-19 ; Aged [MeSH] ; Breast Neoplasms/therapy [MeSH] ; Early Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms/psychology [MeSH] ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/psychology [MeSH] ; Quality of Life [MeSH] ; COVID-19 [MeSH] ; Female [MeSH] ; Follow-Up Studies [MeSH] ; Adult [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Prospective Studies [MeSH] ; Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy [MeSH] ; Longitudinal Studies [MeSH] ; Compliance ; Middle Aged [MeSH] ; Oncology ; Return rate ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures [MeSH] ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/drug therapy [MeSH] ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/therapy [MeSH] ; Research ; Web-based questionnaire ; Patient Compliance/statistics, Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating, Quality of Life, Humans, Patient Compliance, Female, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Longitudinal Studies, Prospective Studies, Aged, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
