
This study explores strategies to improve learner performance in Grade 9 Technology, addressing persistent underperformance in the subject. Technology is a vital subject that equips learners with practical skills applicable beyond the classroom, enabling them to pursue technical courses at tertiary institutions and fostering opportunities for self-employment. An interpretivist paradigm and a qualitative approach were adopted to achieve the study’s objectives. Four technology teachers from two schools in the uMgungundlovu District were selected through convenience sampling and data was gathered through semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis revealed that teachers often fail to align assessments with Bloom’s taxonomy cognitive levels, resulting in unbalanced examination papers that contribute to learners’ poor performance. Guided by Pedagogical Content Knowledge and the Zone of Proximal Development frameworks, the study recommends that the Department of Basic Education provide training to teachers on designing balanced and effective assessments. This paper will contribute to strategies aimed at enhancing teaching effectiveness, improving learner engagement, and informing policy reforms for better academic outcomes. Keywords: Grade 9 Technology, Learner Performance, Underperformance, Assessment Practices, Bloom’s Taxonomy
learner performance, bloom’s taxonomy, underperformance, assessment practices, grade 9 technology, L, Education
learner performance, bloom’s taxonomy, underperformance, assessment practices, grade 9 technology, L, Education
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
