
arXiv: 2407.11616
Python data science libraries such as Pandas and NumPy have recently gained immense popularity. Although these libraries are feature-rich and easy to use, their scalability limitations require more robust computational resources. In this paper, we present PyTond, an efficient approach to push the processing of data science workloads down into the database engines that are already known for their big data handling capabilities. Compared to the previous work, by introducing TondIR, our approach can capture a more comprehensive set of workloads and data layouts. Moreover, by doing IR-level optimizations, we generate better SQL code that improves the query processing by the underlying database engine. Our evaluation results show promising performance improvement compared to Python and other alternatives for diverse data science workloads.
Extended version of ICDE 2024
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Programming Languages, Computer Science - Databases, Databases (cs.DB), Programming Languages (cs.PL)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Programming Languages, Computer Science - Databases, Databases (cs.DB), Programming Languages (cs.PL)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
