
doi: 10.35784/jcsi.6712
Every year, new frameworks and programming libraries appear on the market, trying to gain user interest by presenting their advantages over the competition. The purpose of this article was to compare many aspects of one if such modern solution, i.e. the Solid.js library with a tool recognized on the market, the React.js library, in order to be able to form an opinion on the better choice for a programmer in 2024. The comparative analysis was divided into two parts – performance and theoretical. The research showed Solid.js' performance advantage, but also highlighted its immature ecosystem and limited number of active people in the community.
web applications, application performance, Electronic computers. Computer science, programming libraries, Information technology, QA75.5-76.95, programming frameworks, T58.5-58.64
web applications, application performance, Electronic computers. Computer science, programming libraries, Information technology, QA75.5-76.95, programming frameworks, T58.5-58.64
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
