
doi: 10.1109/18.135640
Summary: A new analysis of sequential decoding is presented that is based on the requirement that a set probability of error \(P_ e\) be achieved. The error criterion implies a bounded tree or trellis search region; the shape of this is calculated for the case of a binary symmetric channel with crossover probability \(p\) and random tree codes of rate \(R\). Since the search region is finite at all combinations of \(p\) and \(R\) below capacity, there is no cut-off rate phenomenon for any \(P_ e>0\). We calculate the decoder delay (search depth), path storage size, and the number of algorithm steps for several methods of tree search. These include searches without backtracking and backtracking searches that are depth- and metric-first. The search depth of the non-backtracking decoders satisfies the Gallager reliability exponent for block codes. In average paths searched, the backtracking decoders are much more efficient, but all types require the same peak storage allocation. Comparisons are made to well-known algorithms; in order of efficiency from best to worst these are Fano-like algorithms, the stack algorithm, algorithms like the \(M\)-algorithm, and the Viterbi algorithm.
stack algorithm, Fano-like algorithms, Decoding, binary symmetric channel, channel decoding, \(M\)- algorithm, error criterion, sequential decoding, search region, block codes, decoder algorithms, Gallager reliability exponent, Viterbi algorithm
stack algorithm, Fano-like algorithms, Decoding, binary symmetric channel, channel decoding, \(M\)- algorithm, error criterion, sequential decoding, search region, block codes, decoder algorithms, Gallager reliability exponent, Viterbi algorithm
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
