
Continued use of acquisitions despite evidence that they do not improve firm performance suggests that challenges associated with acquisitions may be underestimated by managers. We examine how employee resistance is influenced by acquisition integration and how it results in lower acquisition performance. Specifically, we examine different impacts of task and human integration on employee resistance in a sample of 92 Nordic mid-size firms. Task integration focuses on achieving synergies from increased efficiency; however, it can increase employee resistance, leading to lower acquisition performance, which is exacerbated by slow integration. Meanwhile, human integration can reduce employee resistance, and this effect is stronger for experienced acquirers. Our results support the importance of considering both task and human integration, as their influence on employee resistance varies. Additional implications for management research and practice are identified.
330, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/simbe; name=SIMBE, name=SIMBE, name=MGMT Strategy International Management and Business and Entrepreneurship, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/simbe, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/international_business_management_and_strategy; name=MGMT Strategy International Management and Business and Entrepreneurship, 650, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/international_business_management_and_strategy
330, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/simbe; name=SIMBE, name=SIMBE, name=MGMT Strategy International Management and Business and Entrepreneurship, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/simbe, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/international_business_management_and_strategy; name=MGMT Strategy International Management and Business and Entrepreneurship, 650, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/international_business_management_and_strategy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
