
handle: 20.500.11779/3094
Introduction: This study aims to determine the stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) using different machine learning algorithms, and compares the performance of these models. Methods: Demographic, genetic, and neurocognitive inventory data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) database as well as brain volume/thickness data from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were used. Deep Neural Networks, Ordinal Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Gaussian Naive Bayes, XGBoost, and LightGBM models were used to identify four different ordinal stages of AD. Results: Although the performance measures of the developed models were similar, the highest classification rate of AD stages was achieved by the Random Forest model (accuracy: 0.86; F1 score: 0.86; AUC: 0.95). The outputs of the model with the best performance were explained by the SHapley Addictive exPlanations (SHAP) method. Conclusions: This indicates that non-invasive markers and machine learning models can be used effectively in early diagnosis and decision support systems to predict stages of AD.
Matplotlib 3.6.0, Adult, Explainable Artificial Intelligence, Scikit-Learn 1.1.3, Major Clinical Study, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Deep Neural Network, Python Programming Language Version 3.10, Learning Algorithm, Alzheimer's Disease, Sensitivity and Specificity, Article, Machine Learning, Python Libraries Numpy 1.23.0, Artificial Intelligence, Alzheimer Disease, Controlled Study, Neuropathology, Artificial Learning Algorithm, Aged, Principal Component Analysis, Tensorflow 2.10, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Random Forest, Receiver Operating Characteristic, National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center, Depression, Bayesian Learning, Geriatric Depression Scale, Machine Learning Algorithm, Mini Mental State Examination, Decision Support System, Shapley Addictive Explanations, Statsmodel 0.13.5, Logistic Regression Analysis, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Physician, Pandas 1.5.0, Diagnostic Test Accuracy Study, Cognitive Defect, XGBoost, Human
Matplotlib 3.6.0, Adult, Explainable Artificial Intelligence, Scikit-Learn 1.1.3, Major Clinical Study, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Deep Neural Network, Python Programming Language Version 3.10, Learning Algorithm, Alzheimer's Disease, Sensitivity and Specificity, Article, Machine Learning, Python Libraries Numpy 1.23.0, Artificial Intelligence, Alzheimer Disease, Controlled Study, Neuropathology, Artificial Learning Algorithm, Aged, Principal Component Analysis, Tensorflow 2.10, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Random Forest, Receiver Operating Characteristic, National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center, Depression, Bayesian Learning, Geriatric Depression Scale, Machine Learning Algorithm, Mini Mental State Examination, Decision Support System, Shapley Addictive Explanations, Statsmodel 0.13.5, Logistic Regression Analysis, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Physician, Pandas 1.5.0, Diagnostic Test Accuracy Study, Cognitive Defect, XGBoost, Human
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
