
Although original successive cancellation flip (SCF) decoding of the polar codes can identify the first error position and flip the error, decoding still fails when other errors occur after the corrected error bit. Therefore, the improvement of the block error rate (BLER) performance is limited. In this paper, we present an improved algorithm that can correct multiple error bits, named as improved multiple bit-flipping successive cancellation decoding algorithm. First, multiple sets are constructed by calculating the log likelihood ratio (LLR) of each information bit. Then, a bit is selected and corrected from the first set when original decoding fails; two bits are selected and flipped from the second set when all bits in the first set cannot be successfully decoded; when all bits combinations in the second set are flipped but the output vector still does not match the input vector, three bits are selected and corrected from the third set. Simulation results show that the BLER performance of the improved algorithm is better than that of the successive cancellation list decoding (SCL) decoding algorithm with a list size of L = 8 for N = 256. When N = 1024 and SNR = 3 dB, the BLER performance of improved algorithm is slightly better than that of SCL decoding algorithm with a list size of L = 4.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
