Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ https://www.authorea...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
International Urogynecology Journal
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.22541/au.16...
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 6 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Endometrial cancer after the Manchester procedure: a nationwide cohort study

a nationwide cohort study
Authors: Karen R. Husby; Kim O. Gradel; Niels Klarskov;

Endometrial cancer after the Manchester procedure: a nationwide cohort study

Abstract

Objectives To investigate whether the Manchester procedure affects the risk and prognosis of endometrial cancer. Design Nationwide historical cohort. Setting The nationwide Danish registers including all residents with lifelong follow-up. Population All Danish women born 1947–2000, living in Denmark at one point during 1977–2018 undergoing the Manchester procedure (N = 23,935) or anterior colporrhaphy (reference group N = 51,008) during 1977–2018. Methods We conducted a nationwide cohort with full follow-up. Chi-Square test for trend to compare the diagnostic stage for the two groups of women. Cox Regression to analyse the risk of endometrial cancer and mortality. The models were adjusted for age, calendar year, income level, and parity. Main outcome measures Number of women diagnosed with endometrial cancer, the stage of endometrial cancer at the time of diagnosis and the cancer specific and overall mortality. Results During the follow up (median 13 years), 271 (1.13%) women were diagnosed with endometrial cancer after the Manchester procedure and 520 (1.05%) after anterior colporrhaphy. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for endometrial cancer was 1.00 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 1.16). No difference in stage of cancer was found (p=0.18), nor when stratifying for calendar year. The HR for cancer specific mortality and overall mortality after the Manchester procedure was 0.86 (95% CI 0.65 to 1.15) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.12) respectively. Conclusions The Manchester procedure does not affect the risk or prognosis of endometrial cancer. Keywords Epidemiology, endometrial cancer, Manchester procedure, uterine prolapse, pelvic organ prolapse, vaginal hysterectomy

Keywords

Male, Epidemiology, Endometrial Neoplasms/surgery, Vaginal hysterectomy, Hysterectomy, Prognosis, Pelvic organ prolapse, Endometrial Neoplasms, Manchester procedure, Cohort Studies, Epidemiologic Studies, Uterine prolapse, Endometrial cancer, Humans, Hysterectomy/methods, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Green
bronze