
arXiv: 2501.15627
We present HardML, a benchmark designed to evaluate the knowledge and reasoning abilities in the fields of data science and machine learning. HardML comprises a diverse set of 100 challenging multiple- choice questions, handcrafted over a period of 6 months, covering the most popular and modern branches of data science and machine learning. These questions are challenging even for a typical Senior Machine Learning Engineer to answer correctly. To minimize the risk of data contamination, HardML uses mostly original content devised by the author. Current state-of-the-art AI models achieve a 30% error rate on this benchmark, which is about 3 times larger than the one achieved on the equivalent, well-known MMLU-ML. While HardML is limited in scope and not aiming to push the frontier—primarily due to its multiple-choice nature—it serves as a rigorous and modern testbed to quantify and track the progress of top AI. While plenty benchmarks and experimentation in LLM evaluation exist in other STEM fields like mathematics, physics and chemistry, the sub-fields of data science and machine learning remain fairly underexplored. Keywords: Large Language Models, Machine Learning Education, Multiple Choice Benchmark, NLP Benchmarks, Evaluation of AI Systems
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Large Language Models, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Electronic computers. Computer science, Multiple Choice Benchmark, NLP Benchmarks, Evaluation of AI Systems, QA75.5-76.95, Machine Learning Education, Machine Learning (cs.LG)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Large Language Models, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Electronic computers. Computer science, Multiple Choice Benchmark, NLP Benchmarks, Evaluation of AI Systems, QA75.5-76.95, Machine Learning Education, Machine Learning (cs.LG)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
