
handle: 2318/2076750
Discussions on AI ethics and policies often focus on metaphysical questions and normalizing insights, such as the difference between humans and machines and the changing meanings of human intelligence. Since AI is always situated in specific cultural and social contexts, however, such approaches fail to capture key dimensions of the relationships and patterns of interactions that people and institutions around the world have with emerging technologies such as generative AI. This Crosscurrents themed section hosts interventions that tackle this problem. Mobilizing the tradition in media and cultural studies that stresses the importance of situating communication in specific context and cultures, contributors envision potential pathways that bring the question of culture and the dimension of everyday experiences to the center stage, thereby contextualizing AI more rigorously within the dialectic of the global and local cultures. Through this lens, we aim to foster critical dialogue and advance understandings of AI within the contemporary geopolitics of global cultures.
AI policies, media and cultural studies, AI ethics, AI ethics; AI policies; artificial intelligence; cultures; geopolitics; global communication; global media; Global South; media and cultural studies, Global South, geopolitics, artificial intelligence, cultures, global communication, global media
AI policies, media and cultural studies, AI ethics, AI ethics; AI policies; artificial intelligence; cultures; geopolitics; global communication; global media; Global South; media and cultural studies, Global South, geopolitics, artificial intelligence, cultures, global communication, global media
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
