
doi: 10.1002/oca.2332
SummaryThe approximate dynamic programming needs 2 prerequisites to be an effective optimal control method. Firstly, it must be assured to be stable and convergent before application. Secondly, the control system should mainly be a nonlinear multi‐input multi‐output form. Thus, this paper introduces a nonlinear multi‐input multi‐output approximate dynamic programming and proves that it is stable in Lyapunov sense, therefore it is convergent. Besides, the Lyapunov function design is also analyzed. These proofs are based on the Lyapunov stability theory in the form of the utility function of quadratic, square‐weighted sum, and absolute value. Thereafter, 3 typical control examples of nonlinear multi‐input multi‐output approximate dynamic programming are offered to show their applications and verify the proofs. The proof overcomes the complex derivation, and the results contain 3 practical and systematic bounded proofs. It is for the first time that the proof focuses on nonlinear multi‐input multi‐output approximate dynamic programming from the view of utility function. What is more, the results can also serve as an effective analysis and guide for the utility function design and the stability criterion of nonlinear multi‐input multi‐output approximate dynamic programming as well.
idling, bounded proof, Lyapunov stability theory, utility function, Multivariable systems, multidimensional control systems, glider, Robust stability, Dynamic programming, convergent, Discrete-time control/observation systems, emission, multi-input multi-output, nonlinear, Nonlinear systems in control theory, approximate dynamic programming
idling, bounded proof, Lyapunov stability theory, utility function, Multivariable systems, multidimensional control systems, glider, Robust stability, Dynamic programming, convergent, Discrete-time control/observation systems, emission, multi-input multi-output, nonlinear, Nonlinear systems in control theory, approximate dynamic programming
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
