
This study aimed to measure a newly developed automated written evaluation feedback instrument, EditGPT, on the writing performance of 30 Omani EFL learners and their perceptions of this tool’s functionality in learning English as a foreign language (EFL). The learners were divided into three groups: control (receiving general feedback on writing), experimental group A (receiving writing feedback from researchers), and experimental group (receiving writing feedback from EditGPT). To collect the required data, a pretest and posttest of writing based on narration and compare-and-contrast were conducted to measure students’ progress. A questionnaire initially developed by Huang and Renandya (2020) was adopted, translated, and used thoroughly to elicit students’ perceptions. The results showed that experimental group A performed much better than the other two groups; experimental group B, which received feedback only from EditGPT, showed more progress than the control group. The results of this study demonstrate the usability of EditGPT and the role of the teacher in such learning contexts.
automated writing evaluation, perceptions, efl learners, A, writing performance, functionality, General Works
automated writing evaluation, perceptions, efl learners, A, writing performance, functionality, General Works
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
