Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyse recommendations made in domestic homicide reviews (DHRs) in England relating to adult safeguarding – largely focussing on those aged 66+ − to identify key areas for learning and how equality, diversity and inclusion issues (EDI) are considered in DHRs. Design/methodology/approach A mixed methods approach was used to analyse 24 DHRs spanning 2015–2018. A qualitative template was created to extract information, followed by a critical thematic analysis. A quantitative matrix was then developed, enabling a descriptive quantitative analysis, identifying the most prevalent types of recommendations. An additional descriptive quantitative analysis of the 24 DHRs was undertaken for context. Findings Intimate partner homicide comprised half the homicides (12); adult family homicide comprised 11; and one homicide was an amicicide. DHRs recommended improvements in: information management/multi-agency working (83%); targeted domestic abuse training (67%); developing/abiding by policies (67%); enhancing professional practice (54%); improved domestic abuse risk and carers assessments (50%). EDI was seldom considered. Originality/value New analysis is provided on the different types and contexts of domestic homicides involving older adults, the need for strengthened guidance regarding DA and adult safeguarding, tailored DA training and challenging “blind spots” relating to ageist assumptions, the invisibility of familial abuse, a lack of service oversight where care is self-funded and limited consideration of EDI.