Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ https://doi.org/10.2...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3....
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PubMed Central
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: PubMed Central
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://dx.doi.org/10.22028/d2...
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 7 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Controlled Prospective Study on Ultrasound Simulation Training in Fetal Echocardiography: FESIM II

Authors: Paul Janzing; Nasenien Nourkami-Tutdibi; Erol Tutdibi; Paula Freundt; Thomas von Ostrowski; Martin Langer; Michael Zemlin; +1 Authors

Controlled Prospective Study on Ultrasound Simulation Training in Fetal Echocardiography: FESIM II

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: To analyze the learning curves of ultrasound novices in fetal echocardiography during structured simulation-based ultrasound training (SIM-UT) including a virtual, randomly moving fetus. Methods: 11 medical students with minimal (<10h) prior obstetric ultrasound experience underwent 12 hours of structured fetal echo SIM-UT in individual hands-on sessions during a 6-week training program. Their learning progress was assessed with standardized tests after 2, 4, and 6 weeks of SIM-UT. Participants were asked to obtain 11 fetal echo standard planes (in accordance with ISUOG and AHA guidelines) as quickly as possible. All tests were carried out under real life examination-like conditions on a healthy, randomly moving fetus. Subsequently, we analyzed the rate of correctly obtained images and the total time to completion (TTC). As reference groups, 10 Ob/Gyn physicians (median of 750 previously performed Ob/Gyn scans) and 10 fetal echo experts (median of 15000 previously performed Ob/Gyn scans) were examined with the same standardized tests. Results: The students showed a consistent and steady improvement of their ultrasound performance during the training program. After 2 weeks, they were able to obtain >95% of the standard planes correctly. After 6 weeks, they were significantly faster than the physician group (p<0.001) and no longer significantly slower than the expert group (p=0.944). Conclusion: SIM-UT is highly effective to learn fetal echocardiography. Regarding the acquisition of the AHA/ISUOG fetal echo standard planes, the students were able to reach the same skill level as the expert group within six weeks.

Keywords

Female [MeSH] ; Adult [MeSH] ; Students, Medical [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Prospective Studies [MeSH] ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal [MeSH] ; Obstetrics/education [MeSH] ; Male [MeSH] ; Congenital heart disease ; Echocardiography [MeSH] ; Learning Curve [MeSH] ; Maternal-Fetal Medicine ; Simulation-based ultrasound training ; Simulation Training/methods [MeSH] ; Prenatal detection rate ; Ultrasound didactics ; Clinical Competence [MeSH] ; Ultrasound simulation training ; Pregnancy [MeSH] ; Fetal echocardiography, Adult, Male, ddc:610, Students, Medical, Fetal echocardiography, Ultrasound simulation training, 610, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Prenatal detection rate, Obstetrics, Echocardiography, Pregnancy, Humans, Simulation-based ultrasound training, Female, Prospective Studies, Clinical Competence, Ultrasound didactics, Simulation Training, Learning Curve, Congenital heart disease

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Top 10%
Average
Average
Green
hybrid
Related to Research communities