
AbstractBackgroundThe Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) and Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC) were developed to improve risk stratification of indeterminate nodules. Our aim was to assess the clinical utility in a European population with restrictive diagnostic workup.MethodsClinical utility of the GEC was assessed in a prospective multicenter cohort of 68 indeterminate nodules. Diagnostic surgical rates for Bethesda III and IV nodules were compared to a historical cohort of 171 indeterminate nodules. Samples were post hoc tested with the GSC.ResultsThe GEC classified 26% as benign. Surgical rates between the prospective and historical cohort did not differ (72.1% vs. 76.6%). The GSC classified 59% as benign, but misclassified six malignant lesions as benign.ConclusionImplementation of GEC in management of indeterminate nodules in a European country with restrictive diagnostic workup is currently not supported, especially in oncocytic nodules. Prospective studies with the GSC in European countries are needed to determine the clinical utility.
Gene Expression Profiling, Gene Expression, Radboudumc 9: Rare cancers RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc 9: Rare cancers RIMLS: Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center, gene expression classifier, genomic sequencing classifier, Humans, fine-needle aspiration, indeterminate thyroid nodule, Thyroid Nodule, Prospective Studies, Thyroid Neoplasms, Netherlands, Retrospective Studies
Gene Expression Profiling, Gene Expression, Radboudumc 9: Rare cancers RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc 9: Rare cancers RIMLS: Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center, gene expression classifier, genomic sequencing classifier, Humans, fine-needle aspiration, indeterminate thyroid nodule, Thyroid Nodule, Prospective Studies, Thyroid Neoplasms, Netherlands, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
