Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Pamukkale University...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Article . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 7 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Diffusion‐weighted MRI of pulmonary lesions: Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and lesion‐to‐spinal cord signal intensity ratio in lesion characterization

Authors: Çakmak, Vefa; Ufuk, Furkan; Karabulut, Nevzat;

Diffusion‐weighted MRI of pulmonary lesions: Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and lesion‐to‐spinal cord signal intensity ratio in lesion characterization

Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmin) and lesion‐to‐spinal cord signal intensity ratio (LSR) in the differentiation of benign and malignant pulmonary lesions.Materials and MethodsForty‐seven patients (36 men, 11 women; range, 17–81 years) with 62 pulmonary lesions underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) performed using a 1.5T scanner during free‐breathing using b 600 s/mm2. The ADCmin values and LSR were calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to detect the threshold value of the ADCmin and LSR values for discrimination between benign and malignant pulmonary lesions.ResultsThere were 42 malignant (33 primary tumors, 9 metastases) and 20 benign lesions. The mean ADCmin ± standard deviations (×10−3 mm2/s) were 1.45 ± 0.33 for malignant tumors, and 2.4 ± 0.69 for benign lesions (P < 0.001). The mean LSR ± standard deviations for lung cancer was 1.24 ± 0.78, and for benign lesions was 0.55 ± 0.57 (P < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve for ADCmin (0.931; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.868–0.993) was greater than that for LSR (0.801; 95% CI: 0.675–0.926) (P = 0.029). For benign/malignant discrimination, the ROC curve showed threshold value of ADCmin to be 1.78 × 10−3 mm2/s and that of LSR to be 0.86. Using these cutoff values, accuracy of ADCmin and LSR were 89%, 74%, respectively (P = 0.383).ConclusionBeing a contrast‐free and radiation‐free technique, DWI allows discrimination of benign and malignant lung lesions. The ADCmin value performed marginally better than LSR values in distinction of benign and malignant lesions.Level of Evidence: 1J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:845–854.

Related Organizations
Keywords

respiratory tract disease assessment, Male, Lung Neoplasms, organizing pneumonia, tuberculoma, very elderly, lesion to spinal cord signal intensity ratio, image display, non invasive procedure, lung tumor, atelectasis, differential diagnosis, middle aged, lung hydatid cyst, Lung, Aged, 80 and over, clinical article, lung metastasis, adult, Middle Aged, aged, female, neuroectoderm tumor, Spinal Cord, nuclear magnetic resonance scanner, pulmonary lesions, hamartoma, histopathology, apparent diffusion coefficient, lung lesion, young adult, diagnostic accuracy, Female, MRI, minimum apparent diffusion coefficient, Adult, Adolescent, diagnostic imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, 610, neurogenic tumor, Models, Biological, Sensitivity and Specificity, Article, lung, Diagnosis, Differential, Young Adult, male, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, diffusion weighted imaging, Humans, controlled study, human, image enhancement, procedures, reproducibility, Aged, invasive aspergillosis, Wegener granulomatosis, radiological parameters, spinal cord, Reproducibility of Results, computer assisted diagnosis, Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diagnosis, Differential; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/*methods; Female; Humans; Image Enhancement/methods; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/*methods; Lung/*diagnostic imaging/pathology; Lung Neoplasms/*diagnostic imaging/pathology; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Spinal Cord/*diagnostic imaging/pathology; Young Adult, lung adenocarcinoma, biological model, Image Enhancement, human tissue, lung cancer, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, inflammation, tumor differentiation, sensitivity and specificity, adolescent, pathology, small cell lung cancer, squamous cell lung carcinoma

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    32
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
32
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Green