Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Frontiers in Medicin...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Frontiers in Medicine
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PubMed Central
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: PubMed Central
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Frontiers in Medicine
Article . 2025
Data sources: DOAJ
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Efficacy and safety of Jinghua Weikang capsule combined with amoxicillin-furazolidone triple/quadruple therapies in the rescue treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

Authors: Yao Yang; Yao Yang; Xin Deng; Hui-Xia Xiao; Su-Man Ye; Zi-Cheng Wang; Feng Jiang; +8 Authors

Efficacy and safety of Jinghua Weikang capsule combined with amoxicillin-furazolidone triple/quadruple therapies in the rescue treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

Abstract

AimTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of Jinghua Weikang Capsule (JWC) combined with amoxicillin-furazolidone triple/quadruple therapies in the rescue treatment of drug-resistant H. pylori infection.MethodsPatients who failed H. pylori eradication therapy at least once were enrolled and randomly assigned into four groups (1:1:1:1), as follows: The control group received 20 mg rabeprazole, 1,000 mg amoxicillin, 220 mg bismuth potassium citrate, and 100 mg furazolidone twice daily (b.i.d.) for 14 days; Group A received 240 mg JWC b.i.d. combined with 20 mg rabeprazole, 1,000 mg amoxicillin, and 100 mg furazolidone b.i.d. for 14 days; Group B received the same regimen as Group A for 14 days, followed by an additional 14 days of 240 mg JWC b.i.d.; and Group C received 240 mg JWC b.i.d. combined with 20 mg rabeprazole, 1,000 mg amoxicillin, 220 mg bismuth potassium citrate, and 100 mg furazolidone b.i.d. for 10 days. The primary outcome was H. pylori eradication at 4 weeks after treatment.ResultsFour hundred eighty-eight patients were included in this study. The intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication rates in the four groups were 85.2, 73.8, 78.7 and 75.4% (p = 0.136), while the modified intention-to-treat (MITT) eradication rates were 92.0, 84.9, 88.9 and 86.8% (p = 0.398), respectively. And the per-protocol (PP) eradication rates were 92.5, 85.4, 87.9 and 86.7% (p = 0.405), respectively. The eradication rates were comparable among the four groups. No statistically significant differences in eradication rates were observed between each of the three treatment groups and the control group (all p > 0.05). The eradication rate of H. pylori in group B demonstrated non-inferiority compared with the control group (p = 0.0415; 90% CI, −0.0965 to 0.0336). The four groups exhibited similar frequencies of overall adverse events (9.84, 5.74, 6.56%, 2.46%, p = 0.112).ConclusionThe eradication rate of the JWC-containing regimen demonstrated no statistically significant difference compared with bismuth-containing quadruple therapy in the rescue treatment of H. pylori infection. The prolonged JWC treatment regimen exhibited non-inferiority in eradication rates. JWC-containing therapies can effectively reduce the incidence of adverse reactions and significantly alleviate certain clinical symptoms.Clinical trialhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier ChiCTR1800019326.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Medicine (General), R5-920, bismuth-containing quadruple therapy, Helicobacter pylori, Jinghua Weikang capsule, Medicine, multi-center randomized controlled study, rescue treatment

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
gold