
Type inference and type reconstruction derive static types for program elements that have no static type associated with them. They have a wide range of usage, such as helping to eliminate the burden of manually specifying types, verifying whether a program is type-safe, helping to produce more optimized code or helping to understand programs. While type inference and type reconstruction is an active field of research, most existing techniques are interested foremost in the precision of their approaches, at the expense of execution speed. As a result, existing approaches are not suited to give direct feedback in development environments, where interactivity dictates very fast approaches. This paper presents a type reconstruction algorithm for variables that is extremely fast (in the order of milliseconds) and reasonably precise (75 percent). The system is implemented as a byte-code evaluator in several Smalltalk environments, and its execution speed and precision are validated on a number of concrete case studies.
Type Reconstruction, Type Inference, Dynamic Programming Languages, Development Environments
Type Reconstruction, Type Inference, Dynamic Programming Languages, Development Environments
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
