
Interviews in social and health sciences are resource intensive and susceptible to interviewer bias, inconsistency, and variability across interviewers. Moreover, human-led interviews may inhibit participant openness, especially regarding sensitive topics, due to judgment, compromised anonymity, or discomfort in face-To-face interactions. These shortcomings limit the quality of the data collected. To this end, we propose the Embodied Conversational Interview Agentic Service (ELIAS). Informed by human-developed interview guides, ELIAS aims to streamline the interview process by combining an empathetic and bias-free embodied conversational interview agent with a semi-supervised content analysis and coding agent. We describe the development of the first version of ELIAS and also present results from a first evaluation study with five participants. We assessed the acceptance of and alliance with the embodied conversational interview agent. The evaluation shows positive perceptions and a strong alliance with the conversational agent. Suggestions for improvement will guide our future work.
UMAP Adjunct '25: Adjunct Proceedings of the 33rd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
ISBN:979-8-4007-1399-6
Large Language Models, 11549 Institute of Implementation Science in Health Care, Interview Automation, 610 Medicine & health, Embodied Conversational Agent
Large Language Models, 11549 Institute of Implementation Science in Health Care, Interview Automation, 610 Medicine & health, Embodied Conversational Agent
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
