
This research study introduces a unique method that makes use of a wide range of deep learning (DL) techniques for automated flaw identification in solar cell images. The research paper investigates how well 24 distinct convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures— Residual network (ResNet), densely connected convolutional networks (DenseNet), visual geometry group (VGG), Inception, mobile network (MobileNet), Xception, SqueezeNet, and AlexNet—classify solar cells into defected and non-defective categories. This study is interesting since it does a thorough assessment of a wide variety of models and concentrates on high-performance architectures and lightweight models that may be used in contexts with limited resources. The research paper performed our studies using a balanced and well-curated dataset of 3,102 images of solar cells with a range of common faults. MobileNetV2 and Xception demonstrated excellent performance in defect identification, with accuracy rates of 99.95% and 99.29% respectively, with minimal validation losses. This study demonstrates the potential of efficient models such as MobileNetV2 for real-world use in solar energy generation. It also provides a detailed comparison of several DL models. The results suggest that the inclusion of these models might significantly enhance quality control systems, offering a reliable and efficient method for detecting flaws in solar cells.
photovoltaics, defect detection, deep learning, Computer vision, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, image classification, TK1-9971
photovoltaics, defect detection, deep learning, Computer vision, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, image classification, TK1-9971
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
