
doi: 10.5334/ijc.1258
Common pool groundwater resources may be susceptible to overexploitation but can potentially be managed collectively. However, few studies explore the potential for successful collective action ex-ante. We conduct an ex-ante assessment of the potential for collective action by users of a groundwater body, to identify whether necessary conditions are in place, using a mixed methods approach based on literature, expert consultation, and Q methodology. While some aspects were conducive to collective action, under current conditions it appears unlikely that users will self-organize. Four user sub-groups were identified, differing in terms of resource perceptions and prosocial behavior, with potential for tapping into the skills of potential leaders and capitalizing on the prosocial intent of team players, while building bridges for cooperation with sceptics and non-users. Such ex-ante assessment can serve to identify which conditions need to be cultivated to foster cooperation and to identify strategies for engaging with different user sub-groups.
collective action, aquifer, water, malta, Water resources development -- Malta, Aquifers -- Malta, Human beings -- Effect of environment on, q methodology, Nature -- Effect of human beings on, Q technique -- Malta, Social sciences -- Statistical methods, Water -- Malta, social-ecological systems, common pool resources, JF20-2112, Political institutions and public administration (General)
collective action, aquifer, water, malta, Water resources development -- Malta, Aquifers -- Malta, Human beings -- Effect of environment on, q methodology, Nature -- Effect of human beings on, Q technique -- Malta, Social sciences -- Statistical methods, Water -- Malta, social-ecological systems, common pool resources, JF20-2112, Political institutions and public administration (General)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
