
arXiv: 2507.12536
Current quantum annealing experiments often suffer from restrictions in connectivity in the sense that only certain qubits can be coupled to each other. The most common strategy to overcome connectivity restrictions so far is by combining multiple physical qubits into a logical qubit with higher connectivity, which is achieved by adding terms to the Hamiltonian. Practically, this strategy is implemented by finding a so-called minor embedding, which is in itself an NP-hard problem. In this work, we present an iterative algorithm that does not need additional qubits but instead efficiently uses the available connectivity for different parts of the problem graph in every step. We present a weak monotonicity proof and benchmark our algorithm against the default minor-embedding algorithm on the D-Wave quantum annealer and multiple simple local search variants. While most of the experiments to compare the different iterative methods are performed with simulated annealing solvers, we also confirm the practicality of our method with experiments on the D-Wave Advantage quantum annealer.
29 pages, 12 figures
Quantum Physics, Computer Science, Information and General Works::004: Computer Sciences, Computer Science, Information and General Works::006: Special computer methods, quantum annealer D-Wave qubits linearization, FOS: Physical sciences, Natural Sciences and Mathematics::530: Physics, Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Quantum Physics, Computer Science, Information and General Works::004: Computer Sciences, Computer Science, Information and General Works::006: Special computer methods, quantum annealer D-Wave qubits linearization, FOS: Physical sciences, Natural Sciences and Mathematics::530: Physics, Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
