
Clustering algorithms by minimizing an objective function share a clear drawback of having to set the number of clusters manually. Although density peak clustering is able to find the number of clusters, it suffers from memory overflow when it is used for image segmentation because a moderate-size image usually includes a large number of pixels leading to a huge similarity matrix. To address this issue, here we proposed an automatic fuzzy clustering framework (AFCF) for image segmentation. The proposed framework has threefold contributions. First, the idea of superpixel is used for the density peak (DP) algorithm, which efficiently reduces the size of the similarity matrix and thus improves the computational efficiency of the DP algorithm. Second, we employ a density balance algorithm to obtain a robust decision-graph that helps the DP algorithm achieve fully automatic clustering. Finally, a fuzzy c-means clustering based on prior entropy is used in the framework to improve image segmentation results. Because the spatial neighboring information of both the pixels and membership are considered, the final segmentation result is improved effectively. Experiments show that the proposed framework not only achieves automatic image segmentation, but also provides better segmentation results than state-of-the-art algorithms.
Image segmentation, Density peak (DP) algorithm, density peak (DP) algorithm, Fuzzy clustering, fuzzy clustering, superpixel, Superpixel, image segmentation, 004
Image segmentation, Density peak (DP) algorithm, density peak (DP) algorithm, Fuzzy clustering, fuzzy clustering, superpixel, Superpixel, image segmentation, 004
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 115 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
