
IndroductionThis study investigates the impact of China’s Low‐Carbon City Pilot (LCCP) policy, characterized by its flexible and “weakly binding” nature, on Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) patterns.MethodsWe specifically focus on the heterogeneous effects of this flexible environmental regulation over time and its micro‐level mechanisms. Employing a quasi-natural experiment framework and a Difference‐in-Differences (DID) methodology, we analyze city‐level panel data and micro‐level enterprise registration data from 2007–2019.ResultsFindings reveal significant temporal heterogeneity: the first LCCP batch (initiated in 2010) suppressed FDI, while the third batch (2017) promoted it. Mechanistically, the initial batch deterred the entry of both polluting and high‐tech foreign firms, whereas the later batch encouraged investment expansion by existing foreign invested enterprises. Furthermore, the policy’s effects are influenced by FDI saturation, resource endowment, and the rigor of policy implementation. Contrary to the Pollution Haven Hypothesis, no significant regional pollution transfer effect was observed; instead, the third batch stimulated positive FDI spillovers in nearby regions (150–200 km).DiscussionThese results provide empirical evidence on how flexible environmental policies shape FDI, offering insights for balancing economic growth and sustainability.
pollution haven hypothesis, Environmental sciences, DID model, foreign direct investment, low-carbon city pilot policy, GE1-350, heterogeneity
pollution haven hypothesis, Environmental sciences, DID model, foreign direct investment, low-carbon city pilot policy, GE1-350, heterogeneity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
