
We present an implicit enumeration algorithm for a nonseparable quadratic integer programming problem. We utilize fathoming criteria derived from Lemke's complementary pivot algorithm, and compare the use of pseudo-costs versus generalized penalties as a guide to branching. Computational experience is provided.
pseudo-costs, nonlinear extension, quadratic integer programming, implicit enumeration method, Quadratic programming, Lemke's complementary pivot method, parametric penalties, Numerical mathematical programming methods, Boolean programming, implicit upper bounding, guide branching
pseudo-costs, nonlinear extension, quadratic integer programming, implicit enumeration method, Quadratic programming, Lemke's complementary pivot method, parametric penalties, Numerical mathematical programming methods, Boolean programming, implicit upper bounding, guide branching
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 87 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
