
pmid: 36124591
<abstract><p>The need for multi-attribute decision-making brings more and more complexity, and this type of decision-making extends to an ever wider range of areas of life. A recent model that captures many components of decision-making frameworks is the complex $ q $-rung picture fuzzy set (C$ q $-RPFS), a generalization of complex fuzzy sets and $ q $-rung picture fuzzy sets. From a different standpoint, linguistic terms are very useful to evaluate qualitative information without specialized knowledge. Inspired by the ease of use of the linguistic evaluations by means of 2-tuple linguistic term sets, and the broad scope of applications of C$ q $-RPFSs, in this paper we introduce the novel structure called 2-tuple linguistic complex $ q $-rung picture fuzzy sets (2TLC$ q $-RPFSs). We argue that this model prevails to represent the two-dimensional information over the boundary of C$ q $-RPFSs, thanks to the additional features of 2-tuple linguistic terms. Subsequently, some 2TLC$ q $-RPF aggregation operators are proposed. Fundamental cases include the 2TLC$ q $-RPF weighted averaging/geometric operators. Other sophisticated aggregation operators that we propose are based on the Hamacher operator. In addition, we investigate some essential properties of the new operators. These tools are the building blocks of a multi-attribute decision making strategy for problems posed in the 2TLC$ q $-RPFS setting. Furthermore, a numerical instance that selects an optimal machine is given to guarantee the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed approach. Finally, we conduct a comparison with other existing approaches.</p></abstract>
Rough Sets Theory and Applications, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, Artificial intelligence, hamacher operators, Decision Making, Fuzzy Rough Sets, Social Sciences, Group Decision Making, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Management Science and Operations Research, Social psychology, Quantum mechanics, Decision Sciences, decision matrix, Fuzzy Logic, Artificial Intelligence, Group decision-making, QA1-939, FOS: Mathematics, Psychology, aggregation function, Probabilistic Rough Sets, Group (periodic table), Natural language processing, Physics, Theoretical Framework of Cognitive Informatics and Computational Intelligence, Linguistics, 2-tuple linguistic representation model, Discrete mathematics, Computer science, accuracy function, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion, Fuzzy logic, FOS: Psychology, Philosophy, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Fuzzy Sets, Computer Science, Physical Sciences, FOS: Languages and literature, Fuzzy set, Tuple, TP248.13-248.65, Mathematics, Biotechnology
Rough Sets Theory and Applications, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, Artificial intelligence, hamacher operators, Decision Making, Fuzzy Rough Sets, Social Sciences, Group Decision Making, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Management Science and Operations Research, Social psychology, Quantum mechanics, Decision Sciences, decision matrix, Fuzzy Logic, Artificial Intelligence, Group decision-making, QA1-939, FOS: Mathematics, Psychology, aggregation function, Probabilistic Rough Sets, Group (periodic table), Natural language processing, Physics, Theoretical Framework of Cognitive Informatics and Computational Intelligence, Linguistics, 2-tuple linguistic representation model, Discrete mathematics, Computer science, accuracy function, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion, Fuzzy logic, FOS: Psychology, Philosophy, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Fuzzy Sets, Computer Science, Physical Sciences, FOS: Languages and literature, Fuzzy set, Tuple, TP248.13-248.65, Mathematics, Biotechnology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
