
Partitional clustering algorithms are the most widely used approach in clustering problems. However, how to evaluate the clustering performance of these algorithms remains unanswered due to the lack of an efficient measure for accurately representing the separation among partitioned clusters. In this paper, based on two most commonly used partitional clustering algorithms, c-means and fuzzy c-means, and their variants, we developed a new measure, called as dual center, to represent the separation among clusters. The new measure can efficiently represent the separation among various clusters. According to the defined measure, a new validity index is proposed for evaluating the clustering performance of partitional algorithms. Two groups of benchmark datasets with different characteristics were used to validate the effectiveness of the proposed validity index. Experimental results provide evidence that the proposed validity index outperforms some existing representative validity indexes in the two groups of typical and representative datasets.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
