
The state-of-the-art modern pose-graph optimization (PGO) systems are vertex based. In this context the number of variables might be high, albeit the number of cycles in the graph (loop closures) is relatively low. For sparse problems particularly, the cycle space has a significantly smaller dimension than the number of vertices. By exploiting this observation, in this paper we propose an alternative solution to PGO, that directly exploits the cycle space. We characterize the topology of the graph as a cycle matrix, and re-parameterize the problem using relative poses, which are further constrained by a cycle basis of the graph. We show that by using a minimum cycle basis, the cycle-based approach has superior convergence properties against its vertex-based counterpart, in terms of convergence speed and convergence to the global minimum. For sparse graphs, our cycle-based approach is also more time efficient than the vertex-based. As an additional contribution of this work we present an effective algorithm to compute the minimum cycle basis. Albeit known in computer science, we believe that this algorithm is not familiar to the robotics community. All the claims are validated by experiments on both standard benchmarks and simulated datasets. To foster the reproduction of the results, we provide a complete open-source C++ implementation (Code: \url{https://bitbucket.org/FangBai/cycleBasedPGO) of our approach.
Comment: 20 pages
Computer Science - Robotics, Minimum cycle basis; pose graph optimization (PGO); simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM); special Euclidean group (SE(3)), G.2, I.2.9, Computer Science - Discrete Mathematics
Computer Science - Robotics, Minimum cycle basis; pose graph optimization (PGO); simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM); special Euclidean group (SE(3)), G.2, I.2.9, Computer Science - Discrete Mathematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
