Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Nursing R...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Nursing Reports in Clinical Practice
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Effect of educational interventions on nutritional knowledge of cancer prevention based on health belief model: A systematic review

Authors: Megha K. Shah; Mohammad Hajipour; Zahra Sheibani; Alannah L. Couper; Stephanie Sandanasamy; Philip McFarlane;

Effect of educational interventions on nutritional knowledge of cancer prevention based on health belief model: A systematic review

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to assess the impact of educational interventions on nutritional knowledge for cancer prevention using the health belief model. Comprehensive searches were conducted in international electronic databases, including Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science, from their inception until June 16, 2024. Keywords derived from Medical Subject Headings such as "Nutrition Knowledge", "Education", "Health Belief Model", and "Cancer" were utilized. The quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) critical assessment checklist. A total of 611 participants were enrolled in five studies, with 78.39% female and 76.76% in the intervention group. The mean age of participants was 42.12 years (SD=6.47). Of the included studies, one was an RCT, while the remaining four were quasi-experimental. Three studies included a control group, and four studies incorporated a follow-up. Regarding the assessment tools used, four studies employed researcher-developed questionnaires, and one study utilized the nutrition-related cancer prevention knowledge, attitude, and practice (NUTCANKAP) questionnaire for evaluating nutritional knowledge. The mean follow-up period was approximately 14 weeks, and the average duration of the intervention was 54 minutes. Across all studies, the interventions effectively increased nutritional knowledge of cancer prevention based on the health belief model. The findings indicated that education based on the health belief model effectively increased nutritional knowledge of cancer prevention. Health professionals like nurses can use this model to enhance nutritional knowledge. It is recommended that health managers and policymakers create environments that enable health professionals to employ educational strategies based on the health belief model, thereby improving nutritional knowledge.

Keywords

knowledge, prevention, nursing, systematic review, RT1-120, cancer, health, nutritional, Nursing, nurses, educational interventions

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
bronze
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research