
pmid: 27743126
Ideal sedation for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) aims to satisfy both the endoscopist and patient. However, previous studies show that a satisfactory procedure for the endoscopist does not equal higher patient satisfaction. This study attempted to find a sedation protocol that is able to increase patient satisfaction during propofol-based sedation by adding low-dose midazolam as premedication.Seventy-two adult patients were randomly allocated to receive either 0.02 mg/kg midazolam (Midazolam Group) or placebo (Control Group) as premedication before ESD. Sedation was done by targeting Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scale of 3 or 4 with continuous propofol infusion and bolus doses of fentanyl. Satisfaction scores of the endoscopists and patients, and whether the patient was willing to receive the same sedation method in the future was assessed. Interim analysis was done after enrollment of 50 % of patients.This study was prematurely terminated when interim analysis showed that patients willing to receive the same sedation method in the future were significantly lower in the Control Group compared to the Midazolam Group (P = 0.001). There was no difference in sedation time, procedure and recovery time, drug requirements and adverse events between the two groups. Endoscopist and overall patient satisfaction scores, patient pain scores and degree of recall were also similar between groups.A small dose of midazolam given as premedication before propofol-based sedation is able to reduce patient reluctance to repeat the same procedure in the future, without affecting procedural performance, recovery time or endoscopist satisfaction.
Adenoma, Male, Gastrointestinal, Conscious, Endoscopic Mucosal Resection, Gastroscopy/methods*, Midazolam, Premedication, Conscious Sedation, Satisfaction, 610, Stomach Neoplasms/surgery*, Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use*, Stomach Neoplasms, Premedication/methods, Carcinoma/surgery*, Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods*, Gastroscopy, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Propofol, Anesthetics, Conscious Sedation/methods, Aged, Carcinoma, Adenoma/surgery*, Endoscopy, Fentanyl/therapeutic use, Middle Aged, Propofol/therapeutic use, Fentanyl, Patient Satisfaction, Sedation, Midazolam/therapeutic use*, Female, Intravenous/therapeutic use, Patient Satisfaction*, Anesthetics, Intravenous
Adenoma, Male, Gastrointestinal, Conscious, Endoscopic Mucosal Resection, Gastroscopy/methods*, Midazolam, Premedication, Conscious Sedation, Satisfaction, 610, Stomach Neoplasms/surgery*, Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use*, Stomach Neoplasms, Premedication/methods, Carcinoma/surgery*, Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods*, Gastroscopy, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Propofol, Anesthetics, Conscious Sedation/methods, Aged, Carcinoma, Adenoma/surgery*, Endoscopy, Fentanyl/therapeutic use, Middle Aged, Propofol/therapeutic use, Fentanyl, Patient Satisfaction, Sedation, Midazolam/therapeutic use*, Female, Intravenous/therapeutic use, Patient Satisfaction*, Anesthetics, Intravenous
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
