
Atomic-accuracy structure prediction of macromolecules should be achievable by optimizing a physically realistic energy function but is presently precluded by incomplete sampling of a biopolymer’s many degrees of freedom. We present herein a working hypothesis, called the “stepwise ansatz,” for recursively constructing well-packed atomic-detail models in small steps, enumerating several million conformations for each monomer, and covering all build-up paths. By making use of high-performance computing and the Rosetta framework, we provide first tests of this hypothesis on a benchmark of 15 RNA loop-modeling problems drawn from riboswitches, ribozymes, and the ribosome, including 10 cases that are not solvable by current knowledge-based modeling approaches. For each loop problem, this deterministic stepwise assembly method either reaches atomic accuracy or exposes flaws in Rosetta’s all-atom energy function, indicating the resolution of the conformational sampling bottleneck. As a further rigorous test, we have carried out a blind all-atom prediction for a noncanonical RNA motif, the C7.2 tetraloop/receptor, and validated this model through nucleotide-resolution chemical mapping experiments. Stepwise assembly is an enumerative, ab initio build-up method that systematically outperforms existing Monte Carlo and knowledge-based methods for 3D structure prediction.
Models, Molecular, Computers, Protein Conformation, Amino Acid Motifs, Reproducibility of Results, Crystallography, X-Ray, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Nucleic Acid Conformation, RNA, Computer Simulation, RNA, Catalytic, Nucleotide Motifs, Monte Carlo Method, Ribosomes, Software
Models, Molecular, Computers, Protein Conformation, Amino Acid Motifs, Reproducibility of Results, Crystallography, X-Ray, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Nucleic Acid Conformation, RNA, Computer Simulation, RNA, Catalytic, Nucleotide Motifs, Monte Carlo Method, Ribosomes, Software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 63 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
