
Abstract Objectives To analyse clinical outcomes of a non-medical switch from originator adalimumab (ADA) to its ABP501 biosimilar (ABP) over 6 months in patients with inflammatory rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) in relation to comorbidity as a risk factor for therapy discontinuation. Methods RMD patients switching from originator ADA to ABP were identified from a large routine database from October 2018 onwards. Documented clinical data at the time of non-medical switching (baseline), and at 3 and 6 months were collected. Comorbidities were represented by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) at baseline and patients were categorized based on CCI > 0. Differences in the ABP retention rate over 6 months between patients with CCI = 0 and patients with CCI > 0 were analysed using Bayesian exponential regression. Results A total of 111 patients with axial spondyloarthritis (n = 68), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 23) and psoriatic arthritis (n = 15), were identified, 74.8% of whom had continued treatment with ABP after 6 months, while a smaller proportion had either switched to another ADA biosimilar (10.8%), switched back to originator ADA (7.2%), switched to a different biologic (3.6%), or dropped out (3.6%). At baseline, a CCI > 0 was found in 38% of patients. Cardiovascular comorbidities (40%) were most prevalent followed by diseases of the skin (33%), the gastrointestinal tract (20%) and the eye (20%). ABP treatment was continued after 6 months in 74% of patients with CCI = 0 and in 76% with CCI > 0. Bayesian analysis showed only a small difference (months) in the APB continuation rate between groups (estimate 0.0012, 95% credible interval (CrI) -0.0337 to 0.0361). Adjusting for age, sex, and disease subtype revealed somewhat shorter retention rates for patients with CCI > 0, but the distribution of the difference included 0 (estimate -0.0689, 95% CrI -0.2246 to 0.0234). Conclusion In a non-medical switch scenario of RMD patients, there was no evidence for a considerable difference in ABP retention rates over 6 months between comorbidity groups.
Biosimilars, Male, Adult, ddc:610, Drug Substitution, Research, Adalimumab, Bayes Theorem, Diseases of the musculoskeletal system, Comorbidity, Middle Aged, Comorbidities, Treatment Outcome, RC925-935, Adherence, Antirheumatic Agents, Rheumatic Diseases, Humans, Female, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Biosimilars ; Female [MeSH] ; Rheumatic Diseases/drug therapy [MeSH] ; Comorbidities ; Aged [MeSH] ; Adult [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Treatment Outcome [MeSH] ; Drug Substitution/statistics ; Middle Aged [MeSH] ; Bayes Theorem [MeSH] ; Adherence ; Rheumatic Diseases/epidemiology [MeSH] ; Adalimumab/therapeutic use [MeSH] ; Male [MeSH] ; Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use [MeSH] ; Research ; Comorbidity [MeSH] ; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use [MeSH] ; Musculoskeletal Diseases/drug therapy [MeSH] ; Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology [MeSH], Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals, Aged
Biosimilars, Male, Adult, ddc:610, Drug Substitution, Research, Adalimumab, Bayes Theorem, Diseases of the musculoskeletal system, Comorbidity, Middle Aged, Comorbidities, Treatment Outcome, RC925-935, Adherence, Antirheumatic Agents, Rheumatic Diseases, Humans, Female, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Biosimilars ; Female [MeSH] ; Rheumatic Diseases/drug therapy [MeSH] ; Comorbidities ; Aged [MeSH] ; Adult [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Treatment Outcome [MeSH] ; Drug Substitution/statistics ; Middle Aged [MeSH] ; Bayes Theorem [MeSH] ; Adherence ; Rheumatic Diseases/epidemiology [MeSH] ; Adalimumab/therapeutic use [MeSH] ; Male [MeSH] ; Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use [MeSH] ; Research ; Comorbidity [MeSH] ; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use [MeSH] ; Musculoskeletal Diseases/drug therapy [MeSH] ; Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology [MeSH], Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
