
Abstract During embryogenesis, endothelial cells (ECs) are generally described to arise from a common pool of progenitors termed angioblasts, which diversify through iterative steps of differentiation to form functionally distinct subtypes of ECs. A key example is the formation of lymphatic ECs (LECs), which are thought to arise largely through transdifferentiation from venous endothelium. Opposing this model, here we show that the initial expansion of mammalian LECs is primarily driven by the in situ differentiation of mesenchymal progenitors and does not require transition through an intermediate venous state. Single-cell genomics and lineage-tracing experiments revealed a population of paraxial mesoderm-derived Etv2 + Prox1 + progenitors that directly give rise to LECs. Morphometric analyses of early LEC proliferation and migration, and mutants that disrupt lymphatic development supported these findings. Collectively, this work establishes a cellular blueprint for LEC specification and indicates that discrete pools of mesenchymal progenitors can give rise to specialized subtypes of ECs.
Cellbiologi, Cell- och molekylärbiologi, Mouse embryos, Growth-factor-c, Cell Biology, Cell-cycle, General medicine, internal medicine and other clinical medicine, Article, Origin, Identity, Differentiation, Vasculature, Vessels, Utvecklingsbiologi, Lymphangiogenesis, Transcription factor, Genes, Cells and Cell-Based Medicine [Topic 1], Function and Dysfunction of the Nervous System, Cell and Molecular Biology, Developmental Biology
Cellbiologi, Cell- och molekylärbiologi, Mouse embryos, Growth-factor-c, Cell Biology, Cell-cycle, General medicine, internal medicine and other clinical medicine, Article, Origin, Identity, Differentiation, Vasculature, Vessels, Utvecklingsbiologi, Lymphangiogenesis, Transcription factor, Genes, Cells and Cell-Based Medicine [Topic 1], Function and Dysfunction of the Nervous System, Cell and Molecular Biology, Developmental Biology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
