
doi: 10.1111/ejss.70210 , 10.13025/30024
handle: 10379/19230
ABSTRACT Protein profiling of soil samples has the potential to enhance our understanding of soil ecosystems and guide the development of sustainable soil management practices. In that context, there is a need to develop robust proteomic workflows, starting with reliable protein quantification. Total protein quantification with the Lowry assay is a relatively easy, rapid, and cheap method, but requires interference corrections due to reactivity with a wide range of compounds that occur in soil, plant, and other biological matrices. Here, we propose sample‐specific corrections for soil protein extracts. We benchmarked our approach against other protein quantification methods, including other Lowry corrections, total hydrolysable amino acids, and Qubit total protein assay. Our sample‐specific Lowry corrections did not overestimate or underestimate protein content when compared to the other methods tested. As a practical contribution, this work provides a calibration method for the Lowry assay using protein reference values in a multivariate regression approach to enable simple and high‐throughput total protein quantification of soil samples.
total hydrolysable amino acids, interfering substances, protein quantification, Lowry assay, qubit protein assay, soil
total hydrolysable amino acids, interfering substances, protein quantification, Lowry assay, qubit protein assay, soil
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
