
doi: 10.1002/cnm.3697
pmid: 36999653
AbstractThe pelvic structure is complex and the tumor is poorly defined from the surrounding tissues. Finding the exact tumor resection margin based on the surgeon's clinical experience alone is a time‐consuming and difficult task, which is a major factor leading to surgical failure. An accurate method for segmenting pelvic bone tumors is needed. In this paper, a semiautomatic segmentation method for pelvic bone tumors based on CT‐MR multimodal images is presented. The method combines multiple medical prior knowledge and image segmentation algorithms. Finally, the segmentation results are visualized in three dimensions. We tested the proposed method on a collection of 10 cases (97 tumor MR images in total). The segmentation results were compared with the manual annotation of the physicians. On average, our method has an accuracy of 0.9358, a recall of 0.9278, an IOU value of 0.8697, a Dice value of 0.9280, and an AUC value of 0.9632. The average error of the 3D model was within the allowable range of the surgery. The proposed algorithm can accurately segment bone tumors in pelvic MR images regardless of tumor location, size, and other factors. It provides the possibility to assist pelvic bone tumor preservation surgery.
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Bone Neoplasms, Pelvic Bones, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Algorithms, Pelvis
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Bone Neoplasms, Pelvic Bones, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Algorithms, Pelvis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
