Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ YUHSpace (Yonsei Uni...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Surgical Oncology
Article . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The survival outcome and prognostic factors for middle and distal bile duct cancer following surgical resection

Authors: Sae Byeol, Choi; Seung Woo, Park; Kyung Sik, Kim; Jin Sub, Choi; Woo Jung, Lee;

The survival outcome and prognostic factors for middle and distal bile duct cancer following surgical resection

Abstract

AbstractBackground and ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to analyze the survival outcome and the clinicopathological factors that influence survival and recurrence of middle and distal bile duct cancer after surgical resection.MethodsFrom January 2000 to June 2007, 125 patients underwent surgical resection for middle and distal bile duct cancer. The clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes were reviewed retrospectively.ResultsOf the 125 patients, 31 patients underwent segmental resection of the bile duct, and 94 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Overall survival rates were 85.8% at 1 year and 38.3% at 5 years. Lymph node metastasis, noncurative resection, poorly differentiated tumor, and preoperative bilirubin level greater than 5.0 mg/dl were significant independent predictors of poor prognosis by multivariate analysis. The number of metastatic lymph nodes did not significantly affect survival. Recurrence occurred in 72 patients (61.0%). Disease‐free survival rates were 74.1% at 1 year and 42.0% at 3 years. Lymph node and distant metastases and poorly differentiated tumors were found to be significant independent predictors of recurrence by multivariate analysis.ConclusionsR0 resection confers a survival benefit, thus the surgeon should make an effort to achieve R0 resection. The presence of lymph node metastasis was a significant prognostic factor. J. Surg. Oncol. 2009;99:335–342. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Country
Korea (Republic of)
Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Bile Duct Neoplasms/mortality, Tumor/blood*, Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology*, Duodenal Neoplasms/secondary, 610, Local/diagnosis, bile duct cancer, Disease-Free Survival, Lymph Nodes/pathology*, Pancreatic Neoplasms/secondary, R0 resection, Duodenal Neoplasms, Predictive Value of Tests, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Bilirubin/blood*, Aged, Neoplasm Staging, lymph node metastasis, Bilirubin, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Survival Analysis, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Neoplasm Recurrence, Bile Duct Neoplasms, Lymphatic Metastasis, Multivariate Analysis, Female, Bile Duct Neoplasms/blood, Lymph Nodes, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, vAged, Biomarkers, Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery*

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    54
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
54
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Green
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research