
The development of digital learning tools has progressed educational practices even though there is a need for engaging and validated resources tailored for university-level instruction. There are many digital modules lack rigorous development and validation, potentially limiting their effectiveness in enhancing learning experiences. This Research and Development (R&D) study aimed to develop a digital learning module in a flipbook format specifically designed for university learners. Utilizing the instructional development model procedure, the research employed both qualitative and quantitative methodologies where qualitative data were gathered through expert validation feedback, while quantitative data were collected via expert validation through questionnaires. This research employed data collection instruments included questionnaires, observation, and interviews. The participants of the study included students from educational study program. The developed digital flipbook module underwent rigorous validation by subject matter, media, and language experts, achieving high validity scores of 100%, 89.13%, and 97.22%, respectively. Furthermore, the module was tested with university learners through individual trials (96.875% validity), small group trials (91.67% validity), and field trials (90.21% validity), all indicating a "very valid" rating for all matters. The consistently high validation scores across expert review and learner trials provide valid evidence that the developed digital flipbook module is a suitable and effective media for enhancing the university learners’ learning experience. In conclusion, the findings support the idea that digital flipbook module offer both engaging and validated learning resources for university- level education.
digital modules, university education, Digital Learning Tools, instructional development model, instructional materials development
digital modules, university education, Digital Learning Tools, instructional development model, instructional materials development
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
