
pmid: 38810921
Electrocardiographic screening before subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation is unsuccessful in around 10% of cases. A personalized screening method, by slightly moving the electrodes, to obtain a better R/T ratio has been described to overcome traditional screening failure.The objectives of the SIS study were to assess to what extent a personalized screening method improves eligibility for S-ICD implantation and to evaluate the inappropriate shock rate after such screening success.All consecutive patients eligible for an S-ICD implantation were prospectively recruited across 20 French centers between December 2019 and January 2022. In case of traditional screening failure, patients received a second personalized screening. If at least 1 vector was positive, the personalized screening was considered successful, and the patient was eligible for implantation.The study included 474 patients (mean age, 50.4 ± 14.1 years; 77.4% men). Traditional screening was successful in 456 (96.2%) cases. This figure rose to 98.3% (n = 466; P = .002) when personalized screening was performed. All patients implanted after successful personalized screening had correct signal detection on initial device interrogation. Nevertheless, after 1-year follow-up, 3 of the 7 patients (43%) implanted with personalized screening experienced inappropriate shock vs 18 of the 427 patients (4.2%) with traditional screening and S-ICD implantation (P = .003).Traditional S-ICD screening was successful in our study in a high proportion of patients. Considering the small improvement in success of screening and a higher rate of inappropriate shock, a strategy of personalized screening cannot be routinely recommended.gov identifier: NCT04101253.
Male, Implantable*, 610, Electrocardiography, [SDV.MHEP.CSC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Cardiology and cardiovascular system, 616, Humans, Prospective Studies, Inappropriate shock, MESH: Humans, MESH: Middle Aged, Cardiac* / prevention & control, MESH: Follow-Up Studies, Middle Aged, Sudden, MESH: Male, MESH: Prospective Studies, [SDV.MHEP.CSC] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Cardiology and cardiovascular system, Defibrillators, Implantable, MESH: Electrocardiography*, Sudden cardiac death, Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, Death, Sudden, Cardiac, Screening, Female, MESH: Death, MESH: Defibrillators, MESH: Female, Complication, Follow-Up Studies
Male, Implantable*, 610, Electrocardiography, [SDV.MHEP.CSC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Cardiology and cardiovascular system, 616, Humans, Prospective Studies, Inappropriate shock, MESH: Humans, MESH: Middle Aged, Cardiac* / prevention & control, MESH: Follow-Up Studies, Middle Aged, Sudden, MESH: Male, MESH: Prospective Studies, [SDV.MHEP.CSC] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Cardiology and cardiovascular system, Defibrillators, Implantable, MESH: Electrocardiography*, Sudden cardiac death, Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, Death, Sudden, Cardiac, Screening, Female, MESH: Death, MESH: Defibrillators, MESH: Female, Complication, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
