Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Cancer Re...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PubMed Central
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: PubMed Central
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Serveur académique lausannois
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Retrospective comprehensive analysis of regional lymph node recurrence in breast cancer patients (REASON study)

Authors: Liapi, A.; Aedo-Lopez, V.; Jeanneret-Sozzi, W.; Stravodimou, A.; Prior, J.O.; Lalonde, M.N.; Treboux, A.I.; +10 Authors

Retrospective comprehensive analysis of regional lymph node recurrence in breast cancer patients (REASON study)

Abstract

Abstract Background Randomized trials have progressively enabled the de-escalation of axillary surgery in breast cancer (BC) patients, reducing adverse events without compromising survival. Despite a not negligible rate of residual disease in the axilla after sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure, the risk of regional lymph node recurrence (RLNR) is very low, due probably to multimodal adjuvant treatments. The characteristics of the small number of patients with RLNR remain poorly characterized and warrant further investigation, especially given their poor prognosis and the current context of ongoing studies exploring further de-escalation of axillary surgery. Methods In this retrospective and single institution study, we analyzed thoroughly a cohort of patients who experienced RLNR as first event between 2009 and 2020. MammaPrint and BluePrint analysis (MB) was performed in available primary invasive cancer tissues. Results Forty patients, median age of 52, were analyzed. Disease-free interval was 8.7 years. Most of the patients (65%) had no special type BC. Majority (73%) had hormone receptor positive-HER2 negative (HR + /HER2−) BC, 13% triple negative (TNBC), 6% HER2 + , 8% ductal carcinoma in situ and 3% unknown. The median size of the primary tumor was 1.8 cm (range 0.3–7.0) and 57% had no initial LN involvement. Forty five percent had primary SLN procedure and 53% axillary LN dissection (ALND) of the patients received neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy, 63% endocrine therapy and 68% radiotherapy (50% only in breast). Sixty three percent had only RLNR and 38% had concomitant distant metastases. Among irradiated patients, 63% had some relapse in the radiation field. The MB analysis classified 70% of the analyzed cancers as low-risk luminal A (82% in HR + /HER2−), 15% high-risk luminal B, 10% high-risk basal type, and 5% high-risk HER2 type. Conclusion Our study confirms that patients treated with SLN do not show a higher risk of LRNR compared to ALND. LRNR is often diagnosed incidentally. Younger age, residual disease post-NAC, no regional radiation, stage II, and initial LN involvement were more represented, as well as patients with endocrine sensitive disease classified as low-risk luminal A by MB. Ongoing trials, including SOUND, INSEMA, and BOOG 2013-08, are further exploring axillary surgery de-escalation.

Keywords

Recurrent breast cancer, Research, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, Lymph node, Humans; Female; Retrospective Studies; Middle Aged; Breast Neoplasms/pathology; Breast Neoplasms/therapy; Breast Neoplasms/surgery; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology; Aged; Adult; Lymphatic Metastasis; Lymph Nodes/pathology; Lymph Nodes/surgery; Axilla; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy; Prognosis; Sentinel Lymph Node/pathology; Early-stage breast cancer; Locoregional recurrence; Lymph node; Recurrent breast cancer, Locoregional recurrence, Early-stage breast cancer, RC254-282

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
hybrid
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research