Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Frontiers in Public ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Frontiers in Public Health
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Frontiers in Public Health
Article . 2025
Data sources: DOAJ
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Radboud Repository
Article . 2025
Data sources: Radboud Repository
versions View all 6 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Parental behavior and near screen use in childhood: a route to reduce screen induced myopia

a route to reduce screen induced myopia
Authors: Vasanthi Iyer; Vasanthi Iyer; Roel Hermans; Jan Roelof Polling; Caroline Klaver; Caroline Klaver; Caroline Klaver; +3 Authors

Parental behavior and near screen use in childhood: a route to reduce screen induced myopia

Abstract

IntroductionContinuous near work activities like near screen use contribute to the surge in myopia (near sight) prevalence, worldwide particularly among youth. Parental management skills play a crucial role in guiding children's use of digital screens. The aim of the study was to assess near screen use among children and to investigate the role of parental behavioral determinants in its management.MethodsWe conducted an online survey among 395 parents of 9–12-year-olds. We assessed behavioral determinants, components of the CASI-model (Communication Activation Strategic Instrument), near screen use, and parental management, including knowledge, attitude, risk-perception, self-efficacy and (influence of) social environment. We performed logistic regression with parental management skills as outcome, adjusted for parental educational level, age and sex of the child.ResultsOf the 395 9–12-year-olds, 78.7% had their own smart phone. Of these children, 26.0% spent more than 2 h a day on near screens at home. 75.1% of the parents had heard about myopia, of these 59.3% made a significant effort to reduce screen time (odds ratio, 95%-confidence interval: 2.62; 1.59–4.29). Only 28.1% of parents considered the risk of myopia due to handheld screen use to be high, and 62.6% of them spent relatively more efforts to minimize near screen time (1.32; 1.01–1.72). A more negative attitude of parents toward screens was associated with more efforts to reduce screen time (1.25; 1.17–1.35), as was a higher self-efficacy (1.08; 1.03–1.13). Surprisingly, a significant negative association was found between confidence in one's ability to reduce screen use and the efforts made (0.76; 0.58–0.99).ConclusionsParents' knowledge, attitude and self-efficacy relate to their management skills of screen use of children. Mass media campaigns targeting these determinants in parents could help to reduce the risks of myopia and associated complications later in life.

Keywords

Male, Adult, Parenting/psychology, Strategy, Screen Time, Near screen time, eye health, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Child, Myopia/prevention & control, Behavior, Public health, Practice, behavior, Health Knowledge, Eye health, public health, Self Efficacy, near screen time, Attitudes, Female, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270, strategy, Ophthalmology - Perception, action and decision-making, Parents/psychology

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
gold
Related to Research communities