
pmid: 28691532
Objective: To investigate the use of coping styles and the relationships linking coping to emotional distress and quality of life in patients with acquired brain injury and multiple sclerosis. Method: Cross-sectional cohort study of 143 patients with acquired brain injury and 310 patients with multiple sclerosis in the chronic stage. Quality of life was measured with the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LiSat-9), coping styles with the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS-T, task-oriented; CISS-E, emotion-oriented; CISS-A, avoidance), emotional distress with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Results: Coping styles did not differ between types of multiple sclerosis and varied only little with regard to severity of disease. In both patient groups, task-oriented coping was most used followed by avoidance and emotion-oriented coping. Patients with multiple sclerosis used all styles to a greater extent. In acquired brain injury, lower CISS-E and lower HADS scores were associated with higher LiSat-9 scores. CISS-E had a direct effect on LiSat-9 and an indirect effect via HADS. In multiple sclerosis, next to lower CISS-E and lower HADS scores, higher CISS-A scores were also associated with higher LiSat-9 scores. CISS-E had an indirect effect and CISS-A had a direct and indirect effect on LiSat-9. Conclusion: In both patient groups, coping patterns are similar, and emotion-oriented coping negatively influences quality of life. Additionally, in multiple sclerosis, seeking emotional support and distraction (CISS-A) was positively associated with quality of life. Interventions to improve adaptive coping could be organized within a neurorehabilitation setting for both patient groups together.
REHABILITATION, Adult, Male, Multiple Sclerosis, STRATEGIES, Emotions, HOSPITAL ANXIETY, ADJUSTMENT, multiple sclerosis, Stress, Multiple Sclerosis/psychology, Psychological/psychology, Cohort Studies, Young Adult, emotional distress, PARKINSONS-DISEASE, Adaptation, Psychological, Journal Article, 80 and over, Humans, MINDFULNESS-BASED INTERVENTIONS, Adaptation, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, SELF-EFFICACY, Middle Aged, brain injury, Coping style, DEPRESSION SCALE, Cross-Sectional Studies, quality of life, Brain Injuries, Quality of Life, Psychological, Female, PHYSICAL-DISABILITY, SOCIAL SUPPORT, Brain Injuries/psychology, Stress, Psychological
REHABILITATION, Adult, Male, Multiple Sclerosis, STRATEGIES, Emotions, HOSPITAL ANXIETY, ADJUSTMENT, multiple sclerosis, Stress, Multiple Sclerosis/psychology, Psychological/psychology, Cohort Studies, Young Adult, emotional distress, PARKINSONS-DISEASE, Adaptation, Psychological, Journal Article, 80 and over, Humans, MINDFULNESS-BASED INTERVENTIONS, Adaptation, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, SELF-EFFICACY, Middle Aged, brain injury, Coping style, DEPRESSION SCALE, Cross-Sectional Studies, quality of life, Brain Injuries, Quality of Life, Psychological, Female, PHYSICAL-DISABILITY, SOCIAL SUPPORT, Brain Injuries/psychology, Stress, Psychological
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
