
Abstract We solve an expected utility-maximization problem with a Value-at-risk constraint on the terminal portfolio value in an incomplete financial market due to stochastic volatility. To derive the optimal investment strategy, we use the dynamic programming approach. We demonstrate that the value function in the constrained problem can be represented as the expected modified utility function of a vega-neutral financial derivative on the optimal terminal wealth in the unconstrained utility-maximization problem. Via the same financial derivative, the optimal wealth and the optimal investment strategy in the constrained problem are linked to the optimal wealth and the optimal investment strategy in the unconstrained problem. In numerical studies, we substantiate the impact of risk aversion levels and investment horizons on the optimal investment strategy. We observe a $$20\%$$ 20 % relative difference between the constrained and unconstrained allocations for average parameters in a low-risk-aversion short-horizon setting.
ddc:000, Portfolio optimization, Hamilton Jacobi Bellman equations, Dynamic programming in optimal control and differential games, utility maximization, Utility maximization, portfolio optimization, FOS: Economics and business, Portfolio theory, Portfolio Management (q-fin.PM), Optimization and Control (math.OC), 91G10 (Primary), 49L20 (Secondary), 90C39 (Secondary), Investment management, investment management, FOS: Mathematics, Original Research ; Portfolio optimization ; Hamilton Jacobi Bellman equations ; Utility maximization ; Investment management ; Stochastic volatility ; 91G10 ; 49L20, Stochastic volatility, stochastic volatility, Mathematics - Optimization and Control, Quantitative Finance - Portfolio Management, ddc: ddc:
ddc:000, Portfolio optimization, Hamilton Jacobi Bellman equations, Dynamic programming in optimal control and differential games, utility maximization, Utility maximization, portfolio optimization, FOS: Economics and business, Portfolio theory, Portfolio Management (q-fin.PM), Optimization and Control (math.OC), 91G10 (Primary), 49L20 (Secondary), 90C39 (Secondary), Investment management, investment management, FOS: Mathematics, Original Research ; Portfolio optimization ; Hamilton Jacobi Bellman equations ; Utility maximization ; Investment management ; Stochastic volatility ; 91G10 ; 49L20, Stochastic volatility, stochastic volatility, Mathematics - Optimization and Control, Quantitative Finance - Portfolio Management, ddc: ddc:
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
