Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Frontiers in Surgeryarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Frontiers in Surgery
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PubMed Central
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: PubMed Central
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Frontiers in Surgery
Article . 2025
Data sources: DOAJ
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

One year mortality after pediatric hydrocephalus treatment: a comparative analysis of endoscopic third ventriculostomy and ventriculoperitoneal shunt

Authors: Ahmad Alali; Wesam Alkabouni; Viktoria Aretz; Timo Volpert; Yollam Makanjira; Martin Kampeni; Thomas Kapapa; +1 Authors

One year mortality after pediatric hydrocephalus treatment: a comparative analysis of endoscopic third ventriculostomy and ventriculoperitoneal shunt

Abstract

BackgroundManagement options for hydrocephalus have increased to include endoscopic third ventriculostomy with or without choroid plexus cauterization (ETV ± CPC) in addition to traditional ventrikuloperitoneal shunting (VPS). This study evaluates the mortality and complications of these procedures in pediatric hydrocephalus, offering insights for clinical decision-making in a low-income country context.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the operating theatre registry for infants under 1 year of age who underwent initial hydrocephalus surgery in a tertial sub-Saharan hospital in 2021. Follow-up was conducted for up to 1 year after surgery, confirming the patient's vital status (alive or dead) through hospital visits, contact information, and medical records. Descriptive analyses evaluated outcomes (mortality and complications), and survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank testing.ResultsA total of 127 patients were included, with 71 males (55.91%). Complete 1-year follow-up data was available for 94 (74%) patients. Of these, 35 (37.23%) underwent ETV ± CPC and 59 (62.77%) underwent VPS. The one-year survival rate was 80% (95% CI: 66.75%–93.25%) for those treated with ETV ± CPC as a definitive treatment and 78% (95% CI: 67.43%–88.57%) for those who received VPS. There was no statistically significant difference in survival rates between the two groups (Log-Rank test p = 0.809). Shunt sepsis occurred in 6 patients (10.16%, 95% CI: 2.45%–17.87%). The majority of surgical complications occurred within the first 3 months following surgery, including shunt dysfunction in 4 VPS patients (6.7%, 95% CI: 0.32%–13.08%) and failed ETV in 10 patients (22.2%, 95% CI: 8.43%–35.97%) of those who underwent primary ETV.ConclusionETV ± CPC and VPS demonstrated similar survival rates, with no significant statistical difference between the two methods. However, ETV ± CPC failure often required conversion to VPS, highlighting the importance of managing shunt-related complications like sepsis and dysfunction. Careful post-operative monitoring is essential for both procedures.

Keywords

Malawi, RD1-811, hydrocefalus, ETV = endoscopic third ventriculostomy, Surgery, neurosurgery, ventriculo peritoneal shunt

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
gold