
doi: 10.1002/mus.28365
pmid: 39943744
ABSTRACTIntroduction/AimsTo add objectivity to the routine needle electromyography examination, we describe an “Augmented Intelligence” based interference pattern (IP) analysis method that mimics the subjective assessment by quantifying IP fullness, discreteness, amplitude, pitch, and motor unit firing rate (FR).MethodsIP recordings from 20 control subjects and other patients with neuropathy and myopathy were analyzed. The IP was divided into three groups: low, intermediate, and full to mimic visual appearance. Reference values (RVs) were defined for each group. “Fence” pattern was defined based on the discreteness and amplitude. Upper limit of FR was defined. Various technical artifacts were detected and excluded from analysis.ResultsIn control subjects, a total of 2435 recordings from 119 commonly tested muscles were analyzed. The single set of RVs was satisfactory across the tested muscles. Amplitude increased when the pattern changed from low to full. Pitch did not correlate with fullness and its RVs were same for all groups. In patients with neuropathy, an intermediate or low pattern, high amplitude, fence pattern, low pitch, and high FR were demonstrated. In patients with myopathy, a full pattern with low amplitude and high pitch was demonstrated.DiscussionThe algorithm makes simple measurements that are readily interpreted by the electromyographer. In this respect, it augments analysis by providing quantitative data. If implemented in an “on‐line” manner, it can provide guidance to the operator without adding to the procedure time or changing the recording technique. The measurements can also be included in the report to support the study's findings.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
