
Abstract Background: Oncological patients have high information needs that are often unmet. Patient versions of oncological clinical practice guidelines (PVG) translate clinical practice guidelines into laypersons’ language and might help to address patients’ information needs. Currently, 30 oncological PVG have been published in Germany and more are being developed. Following a large multi-phase project on oncological PVGs in Germany, recommendations to improve use and dissemination of PVG were adopted in a multi-stakeholder workshop. Methods: Organisations representing users of PVGs (patients, medical personnel, and multipliers), creators, initiators/funding organisations of PVGs, and organisations with methodological expertise in the development of clinical practice guidelines or in patient health information were invited to participate. The workshop included a World Café for discussion of pre-selected recommendations and structured consensus procedure for of all recommendations. Recommendations with agreement of > 75% were approved, and in case of ≤ 75% agreement, recommendations were rejected. Results: The workshop took place on 24th April 2023 in Cologne, Germany. Overall, 23 people from 24 organisations participated in the discussion. Of 35 suggested recommendations 28 recommendations reached consensus and were approved. The recommendations referre to the topics dissemination (N = 13), design and format (N = 7), (digital) links (N = 5), digitalisation (N = 4), up-to-dateness (N = 3), and use of the PVG in collaboration between healthcare providers and patients (N = 3). Conclusion: The practical recommendations consider various perspectives and can help to improve use and dissemination of oncological PVG in Germany. The inclusion of different stakeholders could facilitate the transfer of the results into practice.
World café, Information Dissemination, Research, Medical Oncology, Humans [MeSH] ; Stakeholder Participation [MeSH] ; Practice Guidelines as Topic [MeSH] ; Patient information ; Oncology ; Workshop ; Information Dissemination/methods [MeSH] ; Research ; Germany [MeSH] ; Neoplasms/therapy [MeSH] ; Recommendations ; Patient version of clinical practice guidelines ; World café ; Consumer health information ; Medical Oncology/standards [MeSH], Patient information, Oncology, Patient version of clinical practice guidelines, Stakeholder Participation, Consumer health information, Germany, Neoplasms, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270, Workshop
World café, Information Dissemination, Research, Medical Oncology, Humans [MeSH] ; Stakeholder Participation [MeSH] ; Practice Guidelines as Topic [MeSH] ; Patient information ; Oncology ; Workshop ; Information Dissemination/methods [MeSH] ; Research ; Germany [MeSH] ; Neoplasms/therapy [MeSH] ; Recommendations ; Patient version of clinical practice guidelines ; World café ; Consumer health information ; Medical Oncology/standards [MeSH], Patient information, Oncology, Patient version of clinical practice guidelines, Stakeholder Participation, Consumer health information, Germany, Neoplasms, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270, Workshop
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
