
arXiv: 2109.02178
This article compares ten recently proposed neural networks and proposes two ensemble neural network-based models for blood glucose prediction. All of them are tested under the same dataset, preprocessing workflow, and tools using the OhioT1DM Dataset at three different prediction horizons: 30, 60, and 120 minutes. We compare their performance using the most common metrics in blood glucose prediction and rank the best-performing ones using three methods devised for the statistical comparison of the performance of multiple algorithms: scmamp, model confidence set, and superior predictive ability. Our analysis highlights those models with the highest probability of being the best predictors, estimates the increase in error of the models that perform more poorly with respect to the best ones, and provides a guide for their use in clinical practice.
17 pages, 20 figures and 16 tables
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, FOS: Biological sciences, 68T05 (Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence), Quantitative Biology - Quantitative Methods, Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM), Machine Learning (cs.LG)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, FOS: Biological sciences, 68T05 (Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence), Quantitative Biology - Quantitative Methods, Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM), Machine Learning (cs.LG)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
